Monday, July 24, 2017
Smearing campaign against China by BBC.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40701121
BBC is following CNN in fake news productions by stating that Vietnam stopped its oil drilling after China's threat.
Let's look at BBC recent reporting.
BBC reported false news about China-India border skirmishes when it stated that China was the first to remind India that China was not the China of 1962.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40478813
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-40653053
The true fact was India was the first to remind China that India was no longer the 1962 India. Subsequently, China retorted by stating that China was also not the 1962 China. BBC omitted the timelines of the statements to create a false impression in its reporting.
Let's look at the timeline reporting below.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/not-the-1962-india-anymore-jaitleys-response-to-china/articleshow/59387725.cms
http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/06/30/india-of-2017-is-different-from-the-india-of-1962-arun-jaitley_a_23009944/
India Arun was the first to state that India was no longer the 1962 India on 30 June 2017.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/china-retaliates-to-arun-jaitley-saying-this-is-not-the-india-of-1962-war-1719900
Then, China retorted on 3 July 2017 by stating China was also not the 1962 China.
However, BBC chose to omit the timelines in its prejudiced reporting and accused China of threatening India. Shame on you, BBC!
BBC is following CNN in fake news productions by stating that Vietnam stopped its oil drilling after China's threat.
Let's look at BBC recent reporting.
BBC reported false news about China-India border skirmishes when it stated that China was the first to remind India that China was not the China of 1962.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-40478813
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-40653053
The true fact was India was the first to remind China that India was no longer the 1962 India. Subsequently, China retorted by stating that China was also not the 1962 China. BBC omitted the timelines of the statements to create a false impression in its reporting.
Let's look at the timeline reporting below.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/not-the-1962-india-anymore-jaitleys-response-to-china/articleshow/59387725.cms
http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/06/30/india-of-2017-is-different-from-the-india-of-1962-arun-jaitley_a_23009944/
India Arun was the first to state that India was no longer the 1962 India on 30 June 2017.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/china-retaliates-to-arun-jaitley-saying-this-is-not-the-india-of-1962-war-1719900
Then, China retorted on 3 July 2017 by stating China was also not the 1962 China.
However, BBC chose to omit the timelines in its prejudiced reporting and accused China of threatening India. Shame on you, BBC!
Sunday, July 23, 2017
US Navy was at fault for the container collision.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/uss-fitzgerald-crash-7-american-sailors-killed-navys-own-fault-philippines-cargo-vessel-a7852681.html
We had already stated clearly that the US destroyer was at fault because it didn't observe international maritime laws. CNN had just released its investigation outcome.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2017/06/usa-destroyer-collision-was-due-to.html
We had already stated clearly that the US destroyer was at fault because it didn't observe international maritime laws. CNN had just released its investigation outcome.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2017/06/usa-destroyer-collision-was-due-to.html
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Baltic dry index - 977
Today, Friday, July 21 2017, the Baltic Dry Index climbed by 13 points, reaching 977 points.
Baltic Dry Index is compiled by the London-based Baltic Exchange and covers prices for transported cargo such as coal, grain and iron ore. The index is based on a daily survey of agents all over the world. Baltic Dry hit a temporary peak on May 20, 2008, when the index hit 11,793. The lowest level ever reached was on Wednesday the 10th of February 2016, when the index dropped to 290 points.
==============================
Related stocks: Sembcorp Marine, Cosco & Pan Ocean.
US rig count - 950
HOUSTON (AP) — The number of rigs exploring for oil and natural gas in the U.S. decreased by two this week to 950.
A year ago, just 462 rigs were active.
Houston oilfield services company Baker Hughes said Friday that 764 rigs sought oil and 186 explored for natural gas this week.
Among major oil- and gas-producing states, Louisiana gained four rigs, California increased by two and North Dakota and Utah each gained one.
Oklahoma and Texas each declined by three, New Mexico fell by two and Alaska decreased by one.
Arkansas, Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Wyoming were all unchanged.
The U.S. rig count peaked at 4,530 in 1981. It bottomed out in May of 2016 at 404.
=======================
Related stocks: Keppel Corp, Sembcorp Marine & Cosco
USA is forcing China to take Taiwan by force.
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2017/07/13/499383/aits-chairman.htm
The USA mooted the idea of performing navy port of call in Taiwan and passed a provision last month. Thereafter, the USA upped its ante by trying to make it a legislation for its navy to establish the port of call in Taiwan.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/china-slams-us-defence-bill-over-taiwan-provision/articleshow/59633295.cms
This is against the one China policy and anti secession law in China. If China doesn't invoke its anti secession law after USA port of call in Taiwan, the Chinese won't trust the communist party anymore. Therefore, China has to take Taiwan by force to satisfy its nationalistic sentiment.
I don't understand how the USA congress can have the power to intrude and contravene another sovereignty. If this practice is allowed in the international arena, any country can do the same and China can also pass a legislation in its parliament to violate the sovereign of USA. Even ICJ which is under UN cannot accept and rule on any case that will violate another sovereignty.
The USA mooted the idea of performing navy port of call in Taiwan and passed a provision last month. Thereafter, the USA upped its ante by trying to make it a legislation for its navy to establish the port of call in Taiwan.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/china-slams-us-defence-bill-over-taiwan-provision/articleshow/59633295.cms
This is against the one China policy and anti secession law in China. If China doesn't invoke its anti secession law after USA port of call in Taiwan, the Chinese won't trust the communist party anymore. Therefore, China has to take Taiwan by force to satisfy its nationalistic sentiment.
I don't understand how the USA congress can have the power to intrude and contravene another sovereignty. If this practice is allowed in the international arena, any country can do the same and China can also pass a legislation in its parliament to violate the sovereign of USA. Even ICJ which is under UN cannot accept and rule on any case that will violate another sovereignty.
Friday, July 21, 2017
Hail storm killed goats in Spain.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4706398/Hail-stone-storm-Spain-killed-sheep-wrecked-cars.html
Freak weather caused by global warming. Sigh!
Failure of the North & South Korea talk, Why?
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/no-korean-military-talks-north-snubs-souths-call-011540288.html
The NK snubbed the SK because NK knew that SK couldn't decide on any terms and conditions since SK was no longer a sovereignty in the eyes of the NK.
Why did I say so?
Well, this is so easy to see. If NK is willing to stop its nuclear development in exchange for the removal of THAAD and US troops in SK, is SK able to make that decision?
The answer is a resounding NO.
The real crux of the problem is actually between USA & NK. Therefore, SK cannot engage NK in any discussion because it cannot make any decision on behalf of USA. The NK knows this but SK doesn't even understand its own position.
As long as the USA is in the picture, there will NEVER be a peaceful resolution between NK & SK.
The NK snubbed the SK because NK knew that SK couldn't decide on any terms and conditions since SK was no longer a sovereignty in the eyes of the NK.
Why did I say so?
Well, this is so easy to see. If NK is willing to stop its nuclear development in exchange for the removal of THAAD and US troops in SK, is SK able to make that decision?
The answer is a resounding NO.
The real crux of the problem is actually between USA & NK. Therefore, SK cannot engage NK in any discussion because it cannot make any decision on behalf of USA. The NK knows this but SK doesn't even understand its own position.
As long as the USA is in the picture, there will NEVER be a peaceful resolution between NK & SK.
Do you eat USA beef? Mad cow disease is detected in USA cow now!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cattle-bse-alabama-idUSKBN1A32IY
I don't eat USA beef because it is laced with ractopamine.
The USA has mad cow disease now! So watch out for your health!
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2016/11/what-do-you-get-for-being-staunch-usa.html
I don't eat USA beef because it is laced with ractopamine.
The USA has mad cow disease now! So watch out for your health!
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2016/11/what-do-you-get-for-being-staunch-usa.html
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Political battles are playing out in China!
Have you ever wondered why billionaires in China are getting into troubles?
http://variety.com/2017/biz/asia/wanda-leeco-add-to-darkening-sentiment-china-financial-markets-1202498324/
This is because President Xi is getting rid of the cohorts that belong to the corrupted system. President Xi is engaged in a dragon-tiger battle in which Xi is the dragon and Hu, Li and Jiang are the 3 tigers.
Let me give you a synopsis of the corrupted system.
Jiang Zemin wielded powers in the military and finance industry. President Xi managed to wrestle the military power from Jiang prior to taking down his key henchman, Zhou Yong Kang. Currently, Jiang Zemin is under house arrest (I verified this with my China relative.).
Li Peng wielded powers in the electrical power and finance industry. President Xi removed Li Peng's daughter from the power industry.
Hu Jin Tao wielded powers in the electrical power and water industry.
Most of the China billionaires are not true entrepreneurs and they amassed tremendous wealth through political powers with their connections. Wanda's Wang Jian Lin was closely connected to Bo Xi Lai who was taken down by Xi because Bo Xi Lai was Zhou Yong Kang's henchman. Wang Jian Lin would follow Bo Xi Lai wherever Bo was posted and Bo would approve Wangda's malls in prime districts.
President Xi had ordered banks to terminate all financing to Wangda which caused Wang Jian Lin to sell his company assets to raise funds. There will be more troubles for Wang Jian Lin because the government is checking his accounts for money laundering.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinas-curbs-wanda-investors-fret-123813928.html
Leeco's founder also got into troubles because of his background.
http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/chinese-court-seizes-millions-assets-leeco-jia-yueting-1202487399/
Jack Ma of Alibaba is very worried now because he is also closely associated with the old guards.
President Xi survived 2 assassinations (one gunshot and one intoxication) while trying to get rid of the 3 tigers. Jiang was believed to be the mastermind of the assassinations.
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-city-leadership-shake-signals-xi-power-play-021744915.html
http://variety.com/2017/biz/asia/wanda-leeco-add-to-darkening-sentiment-china-financial-markets-1202498324/
This is because President Xi is getting rid of the cohorts that belong to the corrupted system. President Xi is engaged in a dragon-tiger battle in which Xi is the dragon and Hu, Li and Jiang are the 3 tigers.
Let me give you a synopsis of the corrupted system.
Jiang Zemin wielded powers in the military and finance industry. President Xi managed to wrestle the military power from Jiang prior to taking down his key henchman, Zhou Yong Kang. Currently, Jiang Zemin is under house arrest (I verified this with my China relative.).
Li Peng wielded powers in the electrical power and finance industry. President Xi removed Li Peng's daughter from the power industry.
Hu Jin Tao wielded powers in the electrical power and water industry.
Most of the China billionaires are not true entrepreneurs and they amassed tremendous wealth through political powers with their connections. Wanda's Wang Jian Lin was closely connected to Bo Xi Lai who was taken down by Xi because Bo Xi Lai was Zhou Yong Kang's henchman. Wang Jian Lin would follow Bo Xi Lai wherever Bo was posted and Bo would approve Wangda's malls in prime districts.
President Xi had ordered banks to terminate all financing to Wangda which caused Wang Jian Lin to sell his company assets to raise funds. There will be more troubles for Wang Jian Lin because the government is checking his accounts for money laundering.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinas-curbs-wanda-investors-fret-123813928.html
Leeco's founder also got into troubles because of his background.
http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/chinese-court-seizes-millions-assets-leeco-jia-yueting-1202487399/
Jack Ma of Alibaba is very worried now because he is also closely associated with the old guards.
President Xi survived 2 assassinations (one gunshot and one intoxication) while trying to get rid of the 3 tigers. Jiang was believed to be the mastermind of the assassinations.
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-city-leadership-shake-signals-xi-power-play-021744915.html
Nam Cheong defaulted on its bonds!
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-20/nam-cheong-stops-servicing-428-million-debt-as-it-restructures
It is not surprising to see Nam Cheong defaulted on its bonds. Please refer to our previous posting on Nam Cheong.
https://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2017/03/what-happened-to-nam-cheong-today.html
It is not surprising to see Nam Cheong defaulted on its bonds. Please refer to our previous posting on Nam Cheong.
https://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2017/03/what-happened-to-nam-cheong-today.html
OMG! Hail storm in Tokyo!
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
World's first electric and autonomous bus completed road test in South China.
When you conduct military exercise in South China Sea, be prepared for China to conduct military exercise near your sea too.
http://www.asianage.com/india/all-india/190517/india-singapore-navies-conduct-joint-exercise-in-s-china-sea.html
India and Singapore conducted military exercise in the South China Sea in May 2017. Therefore, it is not surprising to see China conducting exercises in Indian ocean too.
http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0718/c90000-9243240.html
India and Singapore conducted military exercise in the South China Sea in May 2017. Therefore, it is not surprising to see China conducting exercises in Indian ocean too.
http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0718/c90000-9243240.html
Do you believe in past life or reincarnation?
http://totalalive.com/girl-remembers-past-10-lives/
There is a girl who remembers her 10 past lives and her past lives stories have been verified by a renowned UK anthropologist.
There are many cases of reincarnation in this world and I will just highlight a few amazing stories here.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2016/10/amazing-russian-boy-who-claimed-to-be.html
There is also a China village which is renowned for reincarnation as most of the reincarnations happened in nearby regions.
http://english.china.com/travel/keywords/travelogue/252/20160525/667076.html
There is a girl who remembers her 10 past lives and her past lives stories have been verified by a renowned UK anthropologist.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2016/10/amazing-russian-boy-who-claimed-to-be.html
There is also a China village which is renowned for reincarnation as most of the reincarnations happened in nearby regions.
http://english.china.com/travel/keywords/travelogue/252/20160525/667076.html
Singapore non-oil domestic exports (NODX) - Part 4
Singapore NODX increased 8.2% in June YOY.
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/singapore-nodx-8-2-june-022800800.html
Year on year changes:
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/singapore-nodx-8-2-june-022800800.html
Year on year changes:
June 2017: 8.2%
May 2017: -1.2%
Apr 2017: -0.7%
Mar 2017: 16.5%
Feb 2017: 21.1%
Jan 2017: 8.6%
Dec 2016: 9.1%
Nov 2016: 15.6%
https://sg-stock.blogspot.sg/2017/06/singapore-non-oil-domestic-exports-nodx.html
May 2017: -1.2%
Apr 2017: -0.7%
Mar 2017: 16.5%
Feb 2017: 21.1%
Jan 2017: 8.6%
Dec 2016: 9.1%
Nov 2016: 15.6%
Foreigners' feedbacks are more important to SIA than logical rationale.
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-airlines-to-review-serving-nuts-on-its-flights-after-toddler-has-allergic?xtor=CS11-86?xtor=CS11-86
SIA may stop serving peanuts in its planes because of a toddler's allergy.
Parents should understand their own child's health and it is incumbent upon them to make sure that their kids don't eat a certain food. However, parents have no right to demand airlines not to serve peanuts. Can we demand NTUC not to sell peanuts or peanut butter because our kids are allergic to them?
Service providers have the right to sell/serve but we've the right to reject or not to buy. By insisting the service providers not to offer them is not a democratic solution but a selfish act.
There are many allergies and we can't ban all the food. If someone complains to SIA of chilli allergy, is SIA going to ban chilli? If someone complains to SIA of seafood allergy which is very common, is SIA going to ban seafood too?
I must say SIA has no logical rationale. No wonder it is losing to other airliners.
SIA may stop serving peanuts in its planes because of a toddler's allergy.
Parents should understand their own child's health and it is incumbent upon them to make sure that their kids don't eat a certain food. However, parents have no right to demand airlines not to serve peanuts. Can we demand NTUC not to sell peanuts or peanut butter because our kids are allergic to them?
Service providers have the right to sell/serve but we've the right to reject or not to buy. By insisting the service providers not to offer them is not a democratic solution but a selfish act.
There are many allergies and we can't ban all the food. If someone complains to SIA of chilli allergy, is SIA going to ban chilli? If someone complains to SIA of seafood allergy which is very common, is SIA going to ban seafood too?
I must say SIA has no logical rationale. No wonder it is losing to other airliners.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)