https://sg.news.yahoo.com/us-secretary-state-mike-pompeo-005842713.html
Why did I say that?
When HK was under UK's administration for 99 years, all the HK governors were appointed by the UK and the Hongkongers had no voting right for 99 years. After the 1997 handover, these HK pro-democracy activists started to appear and clamour for voting right to select the HK governor. Why? It is pretty obvious that the western countries are behind this and these activists have sold their souls to the western paymasters. These people are truly ungrateful.
Furthermore, the UK government emptied the HK's coffer before the handover in 1997. After the 1997 handover, the asian financial crisis happened a few months later and HK was defenseless as it had no money to fight off the speculators in the currency and stock markets. China's GDP in 1997 was below US$1t and its foreign reserve was around US$150b.
During that time, China infused HKMA with more than US$80b without hesitation to fight off the currency and stock predators. HK would become a 3rd world province if not for China's generous help especially when China didn't have a huge coffer (only US$150b) in 1997.
After crossing the hardest time in 1997, the HK activists started to disown China. What kind of moral values the HK activists are trying to inculcate to the next generation? Is it right to burn the bridge after crossing it? Can we disown our parents after getting help from them?
.jpg)
