DBS failed to see warning signs for Swiber before default and claimed that it imploded suddenly.

DBS claimed no sign of distress for Swiber and extended more loan to Swiber.  How true is this claim?

http://www.todayonline.com/business/dbs-chief-gupta-defends-decision-extend-lifeline-swiber

However, Kim Eng and S&P stated red flags were there for some time prior to the default.

http://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/swibers-woes-warning-signs-were-there-for-some-time

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/there-were-signs-pointing-to-swibers-troubles-before-collapse-sp-global