Co-Exist Policy (US) | Zero Covid Policy (China) | Winner | |
Infection (Million): | 96.9 | 1.02 | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Total death (‘000): | 1006 | 5.2 | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
7-day ave case: | 35287 | 982 | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
7-day ave death: | 377 | No death after May 2022 | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Long covid case (Million): | 24 | Negligible | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Incapacitated 80% (Million): | 19.2 | Negligible | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Long covid unemployment: | 4 | Negligible | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Long covid wage loss (Billion): | 170 | Negligible | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
GDP Q1: | -1.60% | 4.80% | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
GDP Q2: | -0.60% | 0.40% | Zero Covid Policy (China) |
Sunday, October 23, 2022
Is co-exist policy or zero covid policy better? The truth is out!
We tabulated a metric table based on available statistics and the results confirmed that China was right to implement a zero covid policy.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2022/04/bloomberg-had-acknowledged-success-of.html
Bloomberg had also extolled the success of the zero covid policy previously.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment