Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
08/20/19 | CIMB | Capitaland | 3.46 | 4.15 | Add | RNAV (35% discount) |
08/20/19 | DMG & Partners | GSS Energy | 0.074 | 0.08 | Neutral | DCF |
08/20/19 | Lim & Tan | HMI | 0.720 | 0.73 | Accept offer | offer at $0.73 |
08/20/19 | DMG & Partners | Hyphens Pharma | 0.2 | 0.25 | Buy | DCF |
08/20/19 | Kim Eng | MM2 Asia | 0.186 | 0.2 | Hold | PEG |
08/20/19 | DMG & Partners | Moya Asia | 0.068 | 0.083 | Buy | DCF |
08/20/19 | DMG & Partners | OCBC | 10.71 | 11.5 | Neutral | GGM, PB1.07x FY20 |
08/20/19 | CIMB | UOB | 25.15 | 29.54 | Add |
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Stock calls for 20 August 2019
Thank god! Singapore doesn't need to sell heavily subsidized treated water to JB soon.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/malaysian-minister-says-johor-to-not-be-dependent-on-singapore-for-treated-water-by-2022-010113972.html
Yeah! SG doesn't need to sell heavily subsidized treated water to JB soon....in 2022!
Malaysia has been taking advantage of SG by buying back treated water cheaply for too long.
Just look at Malaysia's announcement without stating the local water treatment cost per 1000 gallons. The Malaysian's government is trying to mislead the general public that SG is overcharging MY without stating the true water treatment cost. The water treatment cost is way higher than $0.50 ringgit per 1000 gallons and it is estimated to be $2.40 ringgit per 1000 gallons (Singapore's treatment cost).
Malaysians should ask their government to come clean with the true water treatment cost but Mahathir won't reveal it.
Water is a strategic supply and should not be held hostage by a foreign country. Even if the local water treatment cost is higher, the country should produce it locally. SG is doing that and MY should follow too. However, by accusing a foreign country of selling the overpriced treated water when instead it is buying the treated water at a heavily subsidized price is a thuggish behaviour.
Nonetheless, SG is happy that this unfair water trade will terminate soon. Cheers!
Yeah! SG doesn't need to sell heavily subsidized treated water to JB soon....in 2022!
Malaysia has been taking advantage of SG by buying back treated water cheaply for too long.
Just look at Malaysia's announcement without stating the local water treatment cost per 1000 gallons. The Malaysian's government is trying to mislead the general public that SG is overcharging MY without stating the true water treatment cost. The water treatment cost is way higher than $0.50 ringgit per 1000 gallons and it is estimated to be $2.40 ringgit per 1000 gallons (Singapore's treatment cost).
Malaysians should ask their government to come clean with the true water treatment cost but Mahathir won't reveal it.
Water is a strategic supply and should not be held hostage by a foreign country. Even if the local water treatment cost is higher, the country should produce it locally. SG is doing that and MY should follow too. However, by accusing a foreign country of selling the overpriced treated water when instead it is buying the treated water at a heavily subsidized price is a thuggish behaviour.
Nonetheless, SG is happy that this unfair water trade will terminate soon. Cheers!
Cathy Pacific suspends ticket sales at HK airport.
https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-08-19/Cathay-Pacific-suspends-tickets-sales-at-counters-at-HK-airport-JhI69AzAkg/index.html
It looks like China is coming down hard on Cathy Pacific.
Cathy Pacific Ceo has rushed to China to try to pacify CAAC so that it can resume its normal flight activities.
It was indeed a flight risk when Cathy Pacific supported its employees to join the HK protests because China couldn't guarantee that Cathy Pacific employees won't do foolish things when the airliner was flying in and out of China airspace since they were emotionally disturbed.
It looks like China is coming down hard on Cathy Pacific.
Cathy Pacific Ceo has rushed to China to try to pacify CAAC so that it can resume its normal flight activities.
It was indeed a flight risk when Cathy Pacific supported its employees to join the HK protests because China couldn't guarantee that Cathy Pacific employees won't do foolish things when the airliner was flying in and out of China airspace since they were emotionally disturbed.
Monday, August 19, 2019
Innotek - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
08/14/19 | Lim & Tan | Innotek | 0.5 | 0 | Buy on weakness |
Indofood Agri - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
03/01/19 | DBS Vickers | Indofood Agri | 0.2 | 0.19 | Hold | DCF |
04/12/19 | DBS Vickers | Indofood Agri | 0.28 | 0.19 | Accept offer | offer price $0.28 |
05/02/19 | DBS Vickers | Indofood Agri | 0.28 | 0.19 | Accept offer | offer price $0.28 |
07/16/19 | DBS Vickers | Indofood Agri | 0.325 | 0.33 | Hold | |
08/05/19 | DBS Vickers | Indofood Agri | 0.32 | 0.29 | Hold | DCF |
IHH Healthcare - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
01/17/19 | Kim Eng | IHH Healthcare | 1.86 | 2.13 | Buy | Sum of parts, Ringgit $6.45 target price |
03/01/19 | Kim Eng | IHH Healthcare | 1.85 | 2.29 | Buy | Sum of parts, Ringgit $6.90 target |
05/31/19 | UOB Kay Hian | IHH Healthcare | 1.79 | 2.07 | Buy | Ringgit $6.30 target price, PER32.8x FY2020 |
06/12/19 | CIMB | IHH Healthcare | 1.84 | 2.09 | Add | Ringgit $6.37 target price |
07/31/19 | Kim Eng | IHH Healthcare | 1.88 | 2.16 | Buy | Sum of parts, Ringgit $6.50 target price |
Stock calls for 19 August 2019
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
08/19/19 | Phillip | APTV | 0.17 | 0.165 | Neutral | EV/Ebitda9.5x |
08/19/19 | Phillip | Capitaland | 3.4 | 4.2 | Buy | PB0.75x FY19 |
08/19/19 | Lim & Tan | City Developments | 9.16 | 0 | Buy | |
08/19/19 | phillip | CNMC | 0.3 | 0.33 | Accumulate | DCF |
08/19/19 | OCBC | Golden Agri | 0.29 | 0.27 | Sell | |
08/19/19 | CIMB | Grand Venture | 0.22 | 0.22 | Hold | |
08/19/19 | CIMB | ISDN | 0.192 | 0.27 | Add | |
08/19/19 | Kim Eng | Manulife US Reit | 0.89 | 1 | Buy | DDM |
08/19/19 | UOB Kay Hian | Overseas Edu | 0.285 | 0.46 | Buy | |
08/19/19 | phillip | Propnex | 0.5 | 0.59 | Buy | |
08/19/19 | Amfrasers | Thai Beverage | 0.885 | 0.8 | Neutral |
Omg! China has displaced Hong Kong with ShenZhen in the greater bay development.
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technology/china-to-boost-shenzhen%E2%80%99s-role-in-greater-bay-area-innovation
The HK protestors have just killed their own future and they must be celebrating their "success" now.
China has decided to displace HK with Shenzhen in the greater bay developments with many favourable economic and preferential policies. HK will lose its importance over time and its economic developments will slow down over time too.
These Hongkongers will need to travel to Shenzhen to find work in the future because HK cannot generate enough job opportunities for these 1.7m protestors in the future with weak economic growth. HK has fallen from its financial hub pedestal and will never rise back to its glorious heyday again.
RIP, HK!
Is HSBC on China's unreliable entity list?
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/banking-finance/hsbc-gets-the-cold-shoulder-in-china
It looks like HSBC is veering towards China's unreliable entity list because it has been excluded from the new loan participation.
HSBC has to do a lot of crisis management and damage control now because China is its major market. By setting up Huawei and letting HSBC account to be used to fund the HK protests, HSBC has proven itself to be anti-China and all these behaviours have to be corrected before China will trust HSBC again.
It looks like HSBC is veering towards China's unreliable entity list because it has been excluded from the new loan participation.
HSBC has to do a lot of crisis management and damage control now because China is its major market. By setting up Huawei and letting HSBC account to be used to fund the HK protests, HSBC has proven itself to be anti-China and all these behaviours have to be corrected before China will trust HSBC again.
Trump: No trade deal before HK problems are solved.
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/usd-flat-trump-wants-hong-004100531.html
Look like there is no need for the US and China to meet in September anymore. It is impossible to solve the HK problems without China's interventions. The HK chief executive is incapable to solve the HK problems on her own or with her current team.
Look like Trump is compelling Xi to intervene in HK issues or else there won't be any US-China trade deal. Trump doesn't want China to honour the 1 country 2 systems structure but China wants to honour it by remaining on the sideline. Therefore, Xi won't intervene unless there is a violent riot or terrorism action in HK. This is not what Trump wants and Trump won't deal with China as stated.
Look like there is no need for the US and China to meet in September anymore. It is impossible to solve the HK problems without China's interventions. The HK chief executive is incapable to solve the HK problems on her own or with her current team.
Look like Trump is compelling Xi to intervene in HK issues or else there won't be any US-China trade deal. Trump doesn't want China to honour the 1 country 2 systems structure but China wants to honour it by remaining on the sideline. Therefore, Xi won't intervene unless there is a violent riot or terrorism action in HK. This is not what Trump wants and Trump won't deal with China as stated.
A billion dollar question: Will the US enter a recession?
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/economists-survey-34-expect-us-040446403.html
2% of economists expect a US recession in 2019.
38% of economists expect a US recession in 2020.
34% of economists expect a US recession in 2021.
Mohammad El Erian doesn't expect a US recession.
Janet Yellen doesn't expect a US recession.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/15/mohamed-el-erian-inverted-yield-curve-recession-signal-distorted.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/14/janet-yellen-say-yield-curve-inversion-may-be-false-recession-signal-this-time.html
What's our stance?
https://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/does-us-2-10y-inverted-yield-curve.html
We also expect a US recession and is most probably happening after Q1 2020.
Let's see who will be right.
2% of economists expect a US recession in 2019.
38% of economists expect a US recession in 2020.
34% of economists expect a US recession in 2021.
Mohammad El Erian doesn't expect a US recession.
Janet Yellen doesn't expect a US recession.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/15/mohamed-el-erian-inverted-yield-curve-recession-signal-distorted.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/14/janet-yellen-say-yield-curve-inversion-may-be-false-recession-signal-this-time.html
What's our stance?
https://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/does-us-2-10y-inverted-yield-curve.html
We also expect a US recession and is most probably happening after Q1 2020.
Let's see who will be right.
Is the seawall able to protect Singapore from getting submerged?
https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/national-day-rally-2019-100-billion-needed-to-protect-singapore-against-rising-sea-levels
SG is setting aside $100B for some major anti-submersion construction.
Is the seawall capable to protect a region from getting submerged?
Building a seawall is a double-edged sword. If it can prevent the seawater from flowing inland in the worst-case weather scenario (severe storm), it is effective. However, if the seawater cannot block out the seawater in the most severe storm, it will trap the seawater inland and the seawater cannot recede fast.
A seawall is not an unequivocal and panacea solution. We should take a leaf out of Indonesia's book. The Indonesian president has just announced he is shifting the Jakarta Capital to Kalimantan in the future despite having some major anti-submersion construction including the seawall.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/indonesia-jakarta-flooding-great-sea-wall-11662564
Why is the Jakarta capital moving despite the construction? This shows that the seawall is not really effective as it proclaimed to be because it is a double-edged solution.
Bangkok is also in the same situation as Jakarta and the Thailand government is also planning to move its Bangkok capital to the north in the future.
Why do these capitals have to move at all if the seawall can block the seawater out? The answer is crystal clear.
SG is setting aside $100B for some major anti-submersion construction.
Is the seawall capable to protect a region from getting submerged?
Building a seawall is a double-edged sword. If it can prevent the seawater from flowing inland in the worst-case weather scenario (severe storm), it is effective. However, if the seawater cannot block out the seawater in the most severe storm, it will trap the seawater inland and the seawater cannot recede fast.
A seawall is not an unequivocal and panacea solution. We should take a leaf out of Indonesia's book. The Indonesian president has just announced he is shifting the Jakarta Capital to Kalimantan in the future despite having some major anti-submersion construction including the seawall.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/indonesia-jakarta-flooding-great-sea-wall-11662564
Why is the Jakarta capital moving despite the construction? This shows that the seawall is not really effective as it proclaimed to be because it is a double-edged solution.
Bangkok is also in the same situation as Jakarta and the Thailand government is also planning to move its Bangkok capital to the north in the future.
Why do these capitals have to move at all if the seawall can block the seawater out? The answer is crystal clear.
Many analysts don't understand economics at all. - Part 2
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/plunging-yields-insatiable-appetite-likely-to-deter-china-from-selling-treasuries-135134871.html
Many analysts are starting to back-peddle or retreat from their previous common analysis that China would unload its US treasuries to punish the US.
We had stated previously that China won't do that. Please read our post below to understand the true rationale and logic behind the US treasuries selloff by China.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/many-analysts-dont-understand-economics.html
Although the analysts had changed their common stance after they realized they were standing on shaky grounds, they had the rationale and logic wrong.
It is a shame that the universities are producing analysts that cannot analyze properly nowadays. Many people don't truly understand what they're studying.......Sigh!
Many analysts are starting to back-peddle or retreat from their previous common analysis that China would unload its US treasuries to punish the US.
We had stated previously that China won't do that. Please read our post below to understand the true rationale and logic behind the US treasuries selloff by China.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/many-analysts-dont-understand-economics.html
Although the analysts had changed their common stance after they realized they were standing on shaky grounds, they had the rationale and logic wrong.
It is a shame that the universities are producing analysts that cannot analyze properly nowadays. Many people don't truly understand what they're studying.......Sigh!
Saturday, August 17, 2019
18 August will be the judgement day for Hong Kong.
The HK protestors will be rallying a mass protest on 18 August (Sunday) with a proclaimed 3-million turnout.
China has warned that if the protest deteriorates into a massive riot, China will intervene by sending its military police and anti-terrorism force into HK. China basic law allows such intervention without HK approval for anti-terrorism action.
Good luck to HK tomorrow!
China has warned that if the protest deteriorates into a massive riot, China will intervene by sending its military police and anti-terrorism force into HK. China basic law allows such intervention without HK approval for anti-terrorism action.
Good luck to HK tomorrow!
The Hong Kong protestors tried to create a bank run in HK but it would be a futile attempt.
https://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/3023065/hong-kongs-banks-say-they-have-adequate-cash-meet-demand
These HK protestors should go back to schools and study more about finance. The HKMA has close to US$450b in reserves for any currency and financial war. It is impossible to even ruffle any feather in the banking system at all. Furthermore, HK has China as its backer to weather out any financial crisis.
https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-information/press-releases/2019/20190807-4.shtml
A bank run is impossible to happen but some inconvenience will be caused to the general public because the banks have to refill the ATM notes more frequently. This will only incur the wrath of the general public and the protestors will suffer more backlashes from the public.
These HK protestors should go back to schools and study more about finance. The HKMA has close to US$450b in reserves for any currency and financial war. It is impossible to even ruffle any feather in the banking system at all. Furthermore, HK has China as its backer to weather out any financial crisis.
https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-information/press-releases/2019/20190807-4.shtml
A bank run is impossible to happen but some inconvenience will be caused to the general public because the banks have to refill the ATM notes more frequently. This will only incur the wrath of the general public and the protestors will suffer more backlashes from the public.
Baltic dry index - 2088
Today, Friday, August 16 2019, the Baltic Dry Index climbed by 41 points, reaching 2088 points.
Baltic Dry Index is compiled by the London-based Baltic Exchange and covers prices for transported cargo such as coal, grain and iron ore. The index is based on a daily survey of agents all over the world. Baltic Dry hit a temporary peak on May 20, 2008, when the index hit 11,793. The lowest level ever reached was on Wednesday the 10th of February 2016, when the index dropped to 290 points.
=========================
Related stock: Sembcorp Marine, Cosco & Pan ocean
Friday, August 16, 2019
IFS Capital - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
01/15/19 | Amfrasers | IFS Capital | 0.225 | 0.29 | Buy | PB0.7x FY18 |
Ifast Corp - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
02/21/19 | DBS Vickers | Ifast Corp | 1.11 | 1.19 | Hold | DDM |
04/30/19 | DBS Vickers | Ifast Corp | 1.12 | 1.05 | Hold | DDM |
07/30/19 | DBS Vickers | Ifast Corp | 1.1 | 1.05 | Hold | DDM |
Hutchison Port - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
02/13/19 | OCBC | Hutchison Port | 0.26 | 0.22 | Sell | |
02/13/19 | DBS Vickers | Hutchison Port | 0.26 | 0.26 | Hold | DCF |
02/25/19 | OCBC | Hutchison Port | 0.235 | 0.22 | Hold | |
04/30/19 | OCBC | Hutchison Port | 0.24 | 0.22 | Hold | |
04/30/19 | DBS Vickers | Hutchison Port | 0.24 | 0.26 | Hold | |
07/25/19 | OCBC | Hutchison Port | 0.225 | 0.22 | Hold | |
07/26/19 | DBS Vickers | Hutchison Port | 0.225 | 0.23 | Hold | DCF |
Stock calls for 16 August 2019
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
08/16/19 | Amfrasers | Accordia Golf Trust | 0.535 | 0.67 | Buy | DDM |
08/16/19 | phillip | Banyan Tree | 0.455 | 0.51 | Accumulate | Sum of parts, PB0.6x FY19 |
08/16/19 | phillip | China Everbright | 0.315 | 0.5 | Buy | PER9x |
08/16/19 | DMG & Partners | CSE Global | 0.44 | 0.61 | Buy | DCF |
08/16/19 | UOB Kay Hian | CSE Global | 0.44 | 0.62 | Buy | |
08/16/19 | phillip | Dasin Retail | 0.87 | 0.94 | Accumulate | DDM, PB0.65x |
08/16/19 | DMG & Partners | Golden Agri | 0.295 | 0.22 | Sell | Sum of parts |
08/16/19 | UOB Kay Hian | Propnex | 0.505 | 0.5 | Hold | |
08/16/19 | DBS Vickers | Sembcorp Industries | 2.26 | 3.2 | Buy | Sum of parts (10% discount), PER16x FY19, PB0.8x FY19 |
08/16/19 | CIMB | ST Engineering | 4.07 | 4.36 | Add | Sum of parts |
08/16/19 | DBS Vickers | ST Engineering | 4.07 | 4.64 | Buy | Sum of parts |
08/16/19 | Lim & Tan | ST Engineering | 4.07 | 0 | Hold | |
08/16/19 | UOB Kay Hian | Sunpower | 0.44 | 0.83 | Buy | |
08/16/19 | CIMB | Thai Beverage | 0.905 | 1 | Add | Sum of parts |
08/16/19 | DMG & Partners | Thai Beverage | 0.905 | 0.92 | Take Profit | Sum of parts, PER19x FY20 |
08/16/19 | DBS Vickers | UMS | 0.585 | 0.49 | Fully Valued | PER9x FY20 |
08/16/19 | Kim Eng | Valuetronics | 0.62 | 0.94 | Buy | ROE-g/COE-g |
08/16/19 | DMG & Partners | Valuetronics | 0.62 | 0.61 | Neutral | DCF |
08/16/19 | UOB Kay Hian | Valuetronics | 0.62 | 0.8 | Buy | |
08/16/19 | OCBC | Wilmar | 3.78 | 4.26 | Buy | |
08/16/19 | DBS Vickers | Wilmar | 3.78 | 4.25 | Buy | Sum of parts, PER16.3x FY20 |
Cathy Pacific top honchos are forced to resign after HSBC.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/rupert-hogg-resigns-ceo-cathay-090923588.html
This is a crystal clear message to conglomerates that anti-government supporters won't be allowed to operate in HK and they will be punished.
Cathy Pacific and HSBC have their roots traced back to the UK. Therefore, the UK is also involved in HK protests.
Insofar, the USA, UK and Taiwan are reported to be involved in HK protests.
This is a crystal clear message to conglomerates that anti-government supporters won't be allowed to operate in HK and they will be punished.
Cathy Pacific and HSBC have their roots traced back to the UK. Therefore, the UK is also involved in HK protests.
Insofar, the USA, UK and Taiwan are reported to be involved in HK protests.
The Hong Kong protestors have lost the general public support.
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/angry-hong-kong-residents-press-anti-protest-demands-in-newspaper-ads
The HK protestors infuriated the general public that the public demanded harsher measures against the protestors in the press.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-fabricated-fake.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-showed-their.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-hong-kong-police-are-incapable-to.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-are-back-at.html
The HK protestors overplayed their hands in the name of democracy and infuriated the general public. We had stated previously that these protestors would be at the receiving end in the end. This is actually happening sooner than we've expected.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/anti-protestors-are-emerging-in-hong.html
The HK protestors infuriated the general public that the public demanded harsher measures against the protestors in the press.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-fabricated-fake.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-showed-their.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-hong-kong-police-are-incapable-to.html
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/hong-kong-protestors-are-back-at.html
The HK protestors overplayed their hands in the name of democracy and infuriated the general public. We had stated previously that these protestors would be at the receiving end in the end. This is actually happening sooner than we've expected.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/anti-protestors-are-emerging-in-hong.html
Singapore Nodx fell 11.2% in July 2019.
Year on year changes (YOY):
July 2019: -11.2%
June 2019: -17.3%
May 2019: -15.9%
April 2019: -10%
March 2019: -11.7%
February 2019: 4.9%
January 2019: -10.1%
December 2018: -8.5%
November 2018: -2.6%
October 2018: 8.3%
September 2018: 8.3%
August 2018: 5%
July 2018: 11.8% (Corrected)
June 2018: 1.1%
May 2018: 15.5%
April 2018: 11.8%
March 2018: -2.7%
February 2018: -5.9%
January 2018: 13%
December 2017: 3.1%
November 2017: 9.1%
October 2017: 20.9%
September 2017: -1.1%
August 2017: 16.7%
July 2017: 8.5%
June 2017: 8.2%
May 2017: -1.2%
Apr 2017: -0.7%
Mar 2017: 16.5%
Feb 2017: 21.1%
Jan 2017: 8.6%
May 2017: -1.2%
Apr 2017: -0.7%
Mar 2017: 16.5%
Feb 2017: 21.1%
Jan 2017: 8.6%
Does the US 2-10y inverted yield curve signify a looming recession?
The US 2-10y inverted yield curve is an accurate harbinger of a looming recession but it does not have a 100% probability.
Will the current 2-10y inverted yield curve be different this time?
Do not listen to any analyst's justification that it will be different this time and let the numbers speak for themselves.
I've learnt in life that relying on statistics is more accurate than listening to any analyst because the numbers don't lie but people will since they interpret the numbers differently.
The problem with the US economy is not the inverted yield curve. The fundamental problem that everyone is not observing is that the US debt growth is so much faster than the GDP growth.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-us-treasury-is-about-to-flood-the-market-with-debt-to-fund-a-1-trillion-deficit-heres-why-that-is-a-worry-2019-08-15?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo
The US has a budget shortfall of US$1T for the full year which is about 4.9% of its GDP but the US GDP growth is only at 2.1%. We can see that the US debt growth is more than 2.3x its GDP growth and this is a recipe for a recession.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us-china-trade-war-impacts-on-both_27.html
Furthermore, the ISM PMI has been falling for 4 consecutive months. This means that the US is still sliding down on the business cycle curve and has not reached its bottom. Therefore, I see no recovery in sight yet. Conversely, the PMI is showing that China has reached the bottom of its business cycle curve and is on a recovery path.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/ism-pmi-analysis-for-us-economy-in-july.html
The US will need to issue more US treasuries to make up for the US$1T budget shortfall and this will definitely push up the short-term bond yields which will cause the inverted yield curve to worsen.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us-total-debt-is-at-us69t-now.html
The US total debt will hit US$70T with this bond issuance.
So tell me, will this 2-10y inverted yield curve be different this time? No! This inverted yield curve is just reflecting the reality that the US is heading into a recession unless the US ends the trade war.
Will the current 2-10y inverted yield curve be different this time?
Do not listen to any analyst's justification that it will be different this time and let the numbers speak for themselves.
I've learnt in life that relying on statistics is more accurate than listening to any analyst because the numbers don't lie but people will since they interpret the numbers differently.
The problem with the US economy is not the inverted yield curve. The fundamental problem that everyone is not observing is that the US debt growth is so much faster than the GDP growth.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-us-treasury-is-about-to-flood-the-market-with-debt-to-fund-a-1-trillion-deficit-heres-why-that-is-a-worry-2019-08-15?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo
The US has a budget shortfall of US$1T for the full year which is about 4.9% of its GDP but the US GDP growth is only at 2.1%. We can see that the US debt growth is more than 2.3x its GDP growth and this is a recipe for a recession.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us-china-trade-war-impacts-on-both_27.html
Furthermore, the ISM PMI has been falling for 4 consecutive months. This means that the US is still sliding down on the business cycle curve and has not reached its bottom. Therefore, I see no recovery in sight yet. Conversely, the PMI is showing that China has reached the bottom of its business cycle curve and is on a recovery path.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/08/ism-pmi-analysis-for-us-economy-in-july.html
The US will need to issue more US treasuries to make up for the US$1T budget shortfall and this will definitely push up the short-term bond yields which will cause the inverted yield curve to worsen.
http://sg-stock.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-us-total-debt-is-at-us69t-now.html
The US total debt will hit US$70T with this bond issuance.
So tell me, will this 2-10y inverted yield curve be different this time? No! This inverted yield curve is just reflecting the reality that the US is heading into a recession unless the US ends the trade war.
A new world, an unchartered territory – A negative yield environment
There are US$16T of negative yield bonds at
this moment as we speak and we have never come across this before in our
lifetime. The world will be in big trouble when the largest economy (USA) is also in a negative yield environment.
The conventional mindset is positive yield
whereby the borrower pays the lender an interest rate to secure a loan and not
the other around. Our current financial
system and economic structure are not built for a negative yield environment.
If we want to accept and adopt a negative
yield environment, we will need to change our mindsets but people are resistant
to changes. How many people can accept
the reality that they are paying the bank an interest rate for their deposits
instead of the bank paying them an interest rate? How many creditors can accept it when they
need to pay borrowers an interest rate?
Where will the banks get the money to lend out when people start to
stash money at home? Many elders in
Japan started to buy safes to keep money at home when the banks started
to charge deposit fees (interests).
In order to minimize the disruptions to the
conventionalists, we will need to restructure our financial system and economic structure which will entail many
uncertainties and risks because we have never done this before in our lifetime. This will be a regime change and it is an
arduous task.
Conversely, if we reject the negative yield
environment and maintain our conventional thinking, we will need to enforce positive
yield on the current situation and cause a great recession or depression to happen.
We are stuck between a rock and a hard
place now. Even the economists are at
their wit ends now because they’ve never studied the negative yield environment
before in their lifetime.
Hong Kong protestors fabricated fake news to defame HK police.
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/young-woman-allegedly-shot-in-the-eye-during-hong-kong-protests
The woman who injured her eye in the protest was actually shot by another protestor who did it with a catapult. She was not shot by the beanbag round used by the police because a beanbag round couldn't cause the injury she sustained. She also didn't lodge an official police report against the police because she knew her injury was not caused by the police.
The video below showed that there was no police near her when she was "shot".
The HK protestors fabricated the news to defame the HK police and used the fake news to orchestrate a violent riot against the HK government and police. This is not a protest but a real riot. The HK police must take a tougher stance against these rioters.
The woman who injured her eye in the protest was actually shot by another protestor who did it with a catapult. She was not shot by the beanbag round used by the police because a beanbag round couldn't cause the injury she sustained. She also didn't lodge an official police report against the police because she knew her injury was not caused by the police.
The video below showed that there was no police near her when she was "shot".
Thursday, August 15, 2019
Hong Kong protestors showed their incompetencies and lack of understanding in their cause.
An Australian knows more about China and HK than the HK protestors. Hahaha!
HK has no more future when the next generation is like that.
China warns the US if it implements the September 1 tariffs.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/asia-stocks-slump-on-recession-fears-11810102
The US has only delayed tariffs against 60% of China goods to December but will still impose tariffs against 40% of China goods on 1 September.
The US is at the receiving end now and the Chinese won't back down because Trump has made it more difficult to reach a trade deal by adding the HK issue to the trade talk list. Trump wants Xi to settle the HK issue humanely first before he is willing to have a trade talk with Xi.
The US has only delayed tariffs against 60% of China goods to December but will still impose tariffs against 40% of China goods on 1 September.
The US is at the receiving end now and the Chinese won't back down because Trump has made it more difficult to reach a trade deal by adding the HK issue to the trade talk list. Trump wants Xi to settle the HK issue humanely first before he is willing to have a trade talk with Xi.
HRnetGroup - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
01/02/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.8 | 1.18 | Buy | DCF |
02/25/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.795 | 1.06 | Buy | DCF |
02/26/19 | DBS Vickers | HRnetGroup | 0.8 | 1.05 | Buy | PER15x FY19, ex-cash |
03/13/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.79 | 1.06 | Buy | |
03/26/19 | CIMB | HRnetGroup | 0.765 | 1.03 | Add | |
05/07/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.77 | 1.06 | Buy | DCF |
05/13/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.77 | 0.94 | Buy | DCF |
05/14/19 | DBS Vickers | HRnetGroup | 0.76 | 0.85 | Hold | PER16x FY19, ex-cash |
06/06/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.71 | 0.94 | Buy | |
06/13/19 | CIMB | HRnetGroup | 0.72 | 1.01 | Add | PER18x CY20 |
08/14/19 | DMG & Partners | HRnetGroup | 0.66 | 0.94 | Buy | DCF |
Hotel Properties (HPL) - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
02/27/19 | Lim & Tan | Hotel Properties | 3.76 | 0 | Hold | |
04/17/19 | OCBC | Hotel Properties | 3.88 | 4.74 | Buy | |
07/15/19 | OCBC | Hotel Properties | 3.69 | 4.74 | Buy |
Hongkong Land - Stock calls
Date | Analyst | Company | Last | Target | Call | Valuation |
01/17/19 | DBS Vickers | Hongkong Land | 6.92 | 7.86 | Buy | |
01/17/19 | Citibank | Hongkong Land | 6.92 | 5.9 | Sell | |
03/01/19 | DBS Vickers | Hongkong Land | 6.77 | 8.02 | Buy | RNAV (40% discount) |
03/01/19 | Citibank | Hongkong Land | 6.77 | 6.45 | Sell | |
05/10/19 | DBS Vickers | Hongkong Land | 6.97 | 8.02 | Buy | RNAV (40% discount) |
08/02/19 | DBS Vickers | Hongkong Land | 6.09 | 7.93 | Buy | |
08/05/19 | DBS Vickers | Hongkong Land | 6.02 | 7.7 | Buy | RNAV (40% discount) |
08/06/19 | CIMB | Hongkong Land | 5.74 | 7.4 | Add | |
08/06/19 | Citibank | Hongkong Land | 5.74 | 5.85 | Sell |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)